- #Final cut pro reviews 2015 full version
- #Final cut pro reviews 2015 1080p
- #Final cut pro reviews 2015 update
- #Final cut pro reviews 2015 software
- #Final cut pro reviews 2015 mac
MacBook Pro late-2013 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 1GB 19.2 seconds
MacBook Pro late-2013 Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB 18.8 seconds It turns out that the test wasn’t tough enough to show a difference between the two GPUs: Over at the the FCP.co forum, qbe asked me to do the ‘Far Far Away’ test on my new late 2013 MacBook Pro 15″ using only the built-in Iris Pro Graphics and also on only the Discrete GeForce GT 750M GPU which I included in my BTO Mac. This test puts enough pressure on main memory and GPU memory to separate older generation Macs from more recent computers.
#Final cut pro reviews 2015 1080p
The Intel Iris and Iris Pro are every bit the match or master of discrete NVIDIA Mobile GPUs - at least when it comes to OpenCL acceleration.Īlthough it is great news that integrated GPUs are getting better, many are worried that the MacBook Pros should be avoided until Iris Pro has improved a little more.Ī speed test proposed by FCP.co was to time the render of Final Cut Pro X’s built-in ‘Far Far Away’ title on a 23.975 1080p timeline. In the past we sneered at the integrated GPUs and their puny performance.
#Final cut pro reviews 2015 software
Editors want to know if the integrated Intel Iris and Iris Pro Graphics GPUs are powerful enough to run professional software well.Įarly testing shows that Iris Pro graphics are better than many expected.
#Final cut pro reviews 2015 mac
New Mac software is depending more and more on GPU power. To help people work out which Macs work best with Final Cut Pro X, it is useful to refer to a standard speed test.Īll but one of the MacBook Pros with Retina configurations do not have dedicated GPUs. Final Cut Pro 10.BruceX: Try this new Final Cut Pro X benchmark
#Final cut pro reviews 2015 update
However, Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve are as good, if not better, and it feels like we’ve been waiting a while for a major update from Apple. It’s a powerful editing application which enables a professional standard of video editing.
In the final estimation, Final Cut Pro certainly shouldn’t be discounted.
#Final cut pro reviews 2015 full version
That said, Premiere’s subscription fee builds up over time, so Final Cut may work out cheaper if you edit often, and the full version of Resolve costs a very similar $295. In comparison, Premiere Pro is $20.99 a month, and the standard version of Resolve is free. And the colour grading, though more intuitive than Adobe’s, doesn’t match up to Resolve’s.įinal Cut Pro costs $299.99, a hefty price tag. However, the social media functionality, though improved in the recent update, is poor compared to Premiere Pro’s. Its interface can be very efficient and it has excellent file organisation. Though it’s not been improved upon in recent years as much as Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, Final Cut Pro still has many advantages. However, DaVinci Resolve is still the best choice for in-depth color grading options. It’s very intuitive, more so than the equivalent in Premiere Pro, and gets good results.
There are also sliders for saturation and brightness around each wheel. You have four wheels-master, shadows, highlights, and midtones-and can drag the centre of each wheel towards the color around the edge, with the resulting color helpfully displayed at the side. If you’re working quickly or aren’t confident with advanced tools, you can automatically balance colour, saturation and exposure, or add one of many presets.īut for precise work, the color wheels tool is very useful. There’s an impressive selection of colour tools. Final Cut Pro 10.5: Social media toolsĬolor wheels allow precise adjustment (Image credit: Apple) This makes it really easy to collect shots you may need later, without interfering with the main organisation of your library, and is a step above the tagging options in other editing software. Plus, you can use keywords to tag not only entire clips but also sections of clips. This useful feature saves time trawling through your footage. Final Cut is also able to analyse clips on import and sort them into folders based on type of shot (long, medium, or close-up), whether they contain people, and whether they’re stable. There are options to create optimised or proxy versions of your video clips when importing to libraries, and to automatically balance colour or fix audio issues. This is useful if you’re likely to make more than one video using the same footage. Rather than importing media to a project, as you would in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, you import to a library, which you can access from multiple projects. There are many options when you import footage (Image credit: Apple)
0 kommentar(er)
